From Encyclopédie to Encyclopédie méthodique : revision and expansion / Kathleen Hardesty Doig.

Author
Doig, Kathleen Hardesty, 1946- [Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Published/​Created
Oxford : Voltaire Foundation, 2013.
Description
xiv, 314 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm

Availability

Available Online

Copies in the Library

Location Call Number Status Location Service Notes
Firestone Library - Stacks AE25.E6 D65 2013 Browse related items Request

    Details

    Subject(s)
    Series
    Summary note
    The last of the great Enlightenment encyclopedias, Charles Joseph Panckoucke's Encyclopédie méthodique was originally conceived as an innovative revision of the Encyclopédie and the Supplément. Arranged in a series of subject-specific dictionaries, it began to appear in 1782 and was completed 50 years later, boasting 203 volumes of text and plates produced by many eminent editors and contributors. Kathleen Hardesty Doig's book is the first to compare the genealogy of the Méthodique with its predecessors as a means to understanding Panchoucke's original vision for his work. Through careful examination of each volume of the Méthodique, the author explores for instance: how Diderot's materialist, anti-clerical articles were scrupulously preserved; how new contributions on religious topics, written by a renowned French theologian, provided a counter-balancing apology of Catholicism; how subjects were augmented or radically transformed, particularly in the sciences where articles reflect groundbreaking research in chemistry and medicine; how these changes illuminate the editors' original goal of an encyclopedia designed to present information in an accessible format to specialists and amateurs alike.
    Bibliographic references
    Includes bibliographical references (pages 295-304) and index.
    ISBN
    • 9780729410779 ((pbk.))
    • 0729410773 ((pbk.))
    LCCN
    2013432572
    OCLC
    864388299
    Statement on language in description
    Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage. Read more...
    Other views
    Staff view