Skip to search
Skip to main content
Catalog
Help
Feedback
Your Account
Library Account
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Search History
Search in
Keyword
Title (keyword)
Author (keyword)
Subject (keyword)
Title starts with
Subject (browse)
Author (browse)
Author (sorted by title)
Call number (browse)
search for
Search
Advanced Search
Bookmarks
(
0
)
Princeton University Library Catalog
Start over
Cite
Send
to
SMS
Email
EndNote
RefWorks
RIS
Printer
Bookmark
Network reporting methods.
Author
Feehan, Dennis Michael
[Browse]
Format
Book
Language
English
Description
xiv, 172 p. ; 29 cm.
Availability
Available Online
arks.princeton.edu
Online Content
Online Content
Copies in the Library
Location
Call Number
Status
Location Service
Notes
Mudd Manuscript Library - Remote Storage (ReCAP): Mudd Library Use Only
PRIN 685 2015
Browse related items
Reading Room Request
Stokes Library - Wallace Hall (SPR)
PRIN 685 2015
Browse related items
Request
Details
Related name
Princeton University. Program in Population Studies
[Browse]
Summary note
This dissertation is about how the science of sampling and survey research can.
be generalized beyond the individual: while traditional surveys ask respondents.
to report about themselves, we study network reporting surveys in.
which respondents are asked to report about others.
Despite many technical challenges, understanding how to design and analyze network.
reporting studies is worth the effort: network reporting surveys can be used to.
study many important rare and hidden populations for which traditional survey.
methods are inadequate.
We begin by introducing the network reporting framework, a general toolkit that.
can help researchers develop new estimators and new data collection methods.
The framework can also help researchers better understand many existing estimators.
We apply the framework to analyze network scale-up, an existing method for.
studying epidemiologically important hidden populations like sex workers and.
drug injectors.
We derive the precise conditions required for the basic scale-up.
estimator to have desirable statistical properties;
we also introduce a new, generalized scale-up estimator, which we.
expect to outperform the existing estimator in many settings.
Next, we turn to a key question for all network reporting studies: which.
personal network should respondents be asked to report about? We conjecture.
that there may be a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of.
information obtained from different personal networks.
We test this conjecture by embedding an experiment in a large,
nationally-representative household survey that we conducted in Rwanda.
Our results show that there may indeed be a trade-off, but future work.
is required to understand this possibility in more detail.
Finally, we apply the network reporting framework to a critical, unsolved.
problem in demography: estimating adult death rates in countries that lack.
complete vital registration systems.
We introduce a new estimator and data collection procedure called.
network survival, and we test our new approach using the Rwanda survey.
Our results demonstrate that a network reporting study is.
feasible in an environment where adult mortality estimates are sorely needed,
and the estimated network survival rates have plausible levels and age-patterns.
However, more work is required before we can fully assess the accuracy of this new.
approach.
Notes
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Dissertation note
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2015.
In
Dissertation Abstracts International 77-03A(E).
ISBN
9781339156996
OCLC
944159305
Statement on language in description
Princeton University Library aims to describe library materials in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections we manage.
Read more...
Other views
Staff view
Ask a Question
Suggest a Correction
Report Harmful Language
Supplementary Information